BBD v Victims Compensation Fund Corporation. [2014] NSWCATAD 176
BBD established he was a victim of an act of violence and sustained compensable physical injury; however, the total compensation for his injuries ($5,160) did not reach the statutory threshold of $7,500 required by s 20 of the Victims Support and Rehabilitation Act 1996, and therefore no compensation is payable.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Victims Compensation Statutory Claim/appeal / Decision on the Papers; Appeal of Original Compensation Assessor's Decision
- Outcome
- Claim for statutory compensation dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Compensation' 'act of Violence' 'threshold Requirement' 'delay in Reporting' 'eligibility for Compensation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Victims Compensation Statutory Claim/appeal / Decision on the Papers; Appeal of Original Compensation Assessor's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether BBD was a victim of an act of violence within the meaning of the legislation' 'Whether BBD sustained compensable injuries meeting statutory requirements' 'Whether BBD failed to report the act of violence within a reasonable time' "Whether BBD's compensable injuries reached the statutory compensation threshold"]
Ratio Decidendi
BBD established he was a victim of an act of violence and sustained compensable physical injury; however, the total compensation for his injuries ($5,160) did not reach the statutory threshold of $7,500 required by s 20 of the Victims Support and Rehabilitation Act 1996, and therefore no compensation is payable.
Court Disposition
Claim for statutory compensation dismissed
Orders
- ['The claim for statutory compensation is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment