BBU16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 2049

BBU16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 2049

No appellable error was found in the primary judge’s decision or in the Tribunal's approach to the evidence and assessment of protection visa claims; all grounds of review were properly considered and rejected.

Parties
Appellant: BBU16; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 December 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Protection Visa, Judicial Review, Procedural Fairness, Administrative Review
Migration Law Administrative Law Protection Visa Judicial Review Procedural Fairness Administrative Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BBU16

Appellant

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

First Respondent

Administrative Appeals Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider an integer of the claim
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider the Appellant's past profile when considering future harm
  3. 3 Whether the primary judge committed appellable error in affirming the Tribunal's decision

Ratio Decidendi

No appellable error was found in the primary judge’s decision or in the Tribunal's approach to the evidence and assessment of protection visa claims; all grounds of review were properly considered and rejected.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The Appellant is to pay the costs of the First Respondent, either as agreed or assessed.