BCL16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1870
The Federal Court does not have jurisdiction to hear an application for an extension of time to appeal from a Federal Circuit Court judgment refusing to grant an extension of time for judicial review in a migration matter because s 476A(3)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) expressly precludes such an appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with costs to the first respondent.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Jurisdiction' 'extension of Time' 'judicial Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to entertain an application for extension of time to appeal an interlocutory decision of the Federal Circuit Court in a migration matter.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court does not have jurisdiction to hear an application for an extension of time to appeal from a Federal Circuit Court judgment refusing to grant an extension of time for judicial review in a migration matter because s 476A(3)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) expressly precludes such an appeal.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with costs to the first respondent.
Orders
- ['The application for extension of time filed on 15 May 2018 be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs to be agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment