BCL16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1870

BCL16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1870

The Federal Court does not have jurisdiction to hear an application for an extension of time to appeal from a Federal Circuit Court judgment refusing to grant an extension of time for judicial review in a migration matter because s 476A(3)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) expressly precludes such an appeal.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 November 2018
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with costs to the first respondent.
Legal Topics
['appeal Jurisdiction' 'extension of Time' 'judicial Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 ['Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to entertain an application for extension of time to appeal an interlocutory decision of the Federal Circuit Court in a migration matter.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Federal Court does not have jurisdiction to hear an application for an extension of time to appeal from a Federal Circuit Court judgment refusing to grant an extension of time for judicial review in a migration matter because s 476A(3)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) expressly precludes such an appeal.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with costs to the first respondent.

Orders

  • ['The application for extension of time filed on 15 May 2018 be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs to be agreed or assessed."]