BCM17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1177
The application for extension of time was dismissed because the lengthy delay was inadequately explained, and the proposed grounds of appeal were of no substance. The Tribunal had assessed all relevant material and properly understood the legislative requirements for serious harm; the applicant's complaints amounted to disagreement with the Tribunal's evaluation rather than legal error.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Extension Application
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time dismissed, with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'protection Visa' 'serious Harm' 'societal Discrimination']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Extension Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether satisfactory explanation for delay in appeal' 'Whether the grounds of appeal have sufficient merit' "Whether Tribunal failed to address applicant's claims" 'Whether applicant faced societal discrimination amounting to serious harm']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for extension of time was dismissed because the lengthy delay was inadequately explained, and the proposed grounds of appeal were of no substance. The Tribunal had assessed all relevant material and properly understood the legislative requirements for serious harm; the applicant's complaints amounted to disagreement with the Tribunal's evaluation rather than legal error.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time dismissed, with costs.
Orders
- ['The application for an extension of time is dismissed, with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment