BDT18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1393
The appellant was not granted leave to raise an entirely new claim of harm on appeal, as such claim was neither before the Authority nor apparent on the record; the Authority had not committed jurisdictional error, and the appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Federal Court of Australia Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs as agreed or assessed.
- Legal Topics
- ['refugee Status Determination' 'jurisdictional Error' 'leave to Raise New Grounds on Appeal' 'evidence in Judicial Review' 'immigration Assessment Authority Process']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Federal Court of Australia Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the primary judge erred in dismissing an application for judicial review of the Immigration Assessment Authority's decision affirming the refusal of a Safe Haven Enterprise Visa" 'Whether the appellant can rely on an entirely new claim not raised below' 'Whether it was an error for the Authority not to consider alleged new harms connected to being forced to become an informant']
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was not granted leave to raise an entirely new claim of harm on appeal, as such claim was neither before the Authority nor apparent on the record; the Authority had not committed jurisdictional error, and the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs as agreed or assessed.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed with costs as agreed or assessed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment