Osborne v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 112

Osborne v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 112

The sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive, considering the seriousness, aggravating factors, and principle of totality. The appeal had no merit and was dismissed.

Parties
Applicant: Beau Allan Osborne; Respondent: Crown
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 May 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal Determination
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeal, Sentencing, Robbery, Repeat Offending, Manifestly Excessive Sentence
Criminal Law Appeal Sentencing Robbery Repeat Offending Manifestly Excessive Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Beau Allan Osborne

Applicant

Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentences imposed for multiple robberies were manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Assessment of aggravating and mitigating factors in sentencing
  3. 3 Application of the principle of totality in sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

The sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive, considering the seriousness, aggravating factors, and principle of totality. The appeal had no merit and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted
  • Appeal dismissed