REGINA v. KHAZAL [2004] NSWSC 548
The respondent discharged the onus under s.8A of the Bail Act 1978 by demonstrating, through compliance with prior bail conditions, lack of flight risk, absence of violence in the offence charged, significant personal disabilities, and proffered undertakings, that bail should not be refused despite the seriousness of the charge and strength of the Crown case.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Bail Application (s.45 Bail Act 1978) Review of Grant of Bail
- Outcome
- Bail granted (continued on existing terms)
- Legal Topics
- ['bail' 'burden of Proof on Bail Applications' 'terrorism Offences' 'bail Act 1978 S.8 A' 'criminal Code Act (cth) S.101.5']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Bail Application (s.45 Bail Act 1978) Review of Grant of Bail
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondent should be granted bail under s.8A of the Bail Act 1978 for an offence under s.101.5 of the Criminal Code Act (Cth).' 'What weight should be given to the gravity of the alleged offence, the strength of the prosecution case, the respondent’s personal circumstances, and the proffered bail conditions.']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent discharged the onus under s.8A of the Bail Act 1978 by demonstrating, through compliance with prior bail conditions, lack of flight risk, absence of violence in the offence charged, significant personal disabilities, and proffered undertakings, that bail should not be refused despite the seriousness of the charge and strength of the Crown case.
Court Disposition
Bail granted (continued on existing terms)
Orders
- ['Bail continued over the adjournment on existing terms.' 'Adjourned to Thursday 24 June 2004.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment