Shamieh v Waverley Council [2019] NSWLEC 1144
The amended development was permissible in the R2 Residential low density zone, complied with height, floor space ratio and setback controls, no longer required pedestrian access from Loombah Road over the Council's road reserve, and addressed the jurisdictional prerequisites to the grant of consent. The parties' decision was therefore one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, requiring the Court under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of a Development Application / Orders Following S 34 AA Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; leave granted to amend the development application; development consent granted subject to conditions; costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'development Consent' 'conciliation Conference' 'amendment of Development Application' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of a Development Application / Orders Following S 34 AA Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the amended Development Application could be approved in the proper exercise of the Court's functions." "Whether the parties' agreement following conciliation should be given effect under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether jurisdictional prerequisites to the grant of development consent had been addressed.']
Ratio Decidendi
The amended development was permissible in the R2 Residential low density zone, complied with height, floor space ratio and setback controls, no longer required pedestrian access from Loombah Road over the Council's road reserve, and addressed the jurisdictional prerequisites to the grant of consent. The parties' decision was therefore one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, requiring the Court under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; leave granted to amend the development application; development consent granted subject to conditions; costs ordered.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application DA-94/2017 and to rely upon the amended plans and documents listed in Condition 1 of Annexure "A" hereto.' "The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the sum of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment