Charlton v Moore [2009] NSWLEC 61

Charlton v Moore [2009] NSWLEC 61

Gary Woodman was to be joined because the applicant challenged the validity of the Singleton Council resolution under which he would be acting general manager from 23 March to 30 June 2009, so his legal interests would be directly affected if the applicant's relief were granted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 March 2009
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion for Joinder of a Party / Ex Tempore Judgment on Applicant's Notice of Motion to Join Gary Woodman as Fourth Respondent
Outcome
Notice of motion granted; Gary Woodman joined as fourth respondent.
Legal Topics
['joinder of a Party' 'uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 R 6.24(1)']
['practice and Procedure'] ['joinder of a Party' 'uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 R 6.24(1)']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion for Joinder of a Party / Ex Tempore Judgment on Applicant's Notice of Motion to Join Gary Woodman as Fourth Respondent

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Gary Woodman ought to be joined as a party or was necessary to the determination of all matters in dispute in the proceedings.']

Ratio Decidendi

Gary Woodman was to be joined because the applicant challenged the validity of the Singleton Council resolution under which he would be acting general manager from 23 March to 30 June 2009, so his legal interests would be directly affected if the applicant's relief were granted.

Court Disposition

Notice of motion granted; Gary Woodman joined as fourth respondent.

Orders

  • ['Gary Woodman be joined as fourth respondent.' 'The exhibits may be returned.']