Charlton v Moore ( No 3) [2009] NSWLEC 48
The hearing dates should be vacated because the respondents established multiple practical and procedural reasons why the allocated hearing could not fairly or efficiently proceed, and the applicant consented; vacation was appropriate on condition that the parties proceed to mediation if possible on the vacated dates or as soon as possible thereafter.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Practice and Procedure Motion / Respondents' Motion to Vacate Hearing Dates; Ex Tempore Judgment
- Outcome
- Respondents' motion granted; hearing dates vacated on condition that the parties proceed to mediation if possible on the vacated dates or as soon as possible thereafter.
- Legal Topics
- ['vacation of Hearing Dates' 'mediation' 'court Directions' 'joinder' 'bias Allegations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Practice and Procedure Motion / Respondents' Motion to Vacate Hearing Dates; Ex Tempore Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the hearing dates fixed for 24 and 25 March 2009 should be vacated.' 'Whether vacation of the hearing dates should be conditional on the parties proceeding to mediation.']
Ratio Decidendi
The hearing dates should be vacated because the respondents established multiple practical and procedural reasons why the allocated hearing could not fairly or efficiently proceed, and the applicant consented; vacation was appropriate on condition that the parties proceed to mediation if possible on the vacated dates or as soon as possible thereafter.
Court Disposition
Respondents' motion granted; hearing dates vacated on condition that the parties proceed to mediation if possible on the vacated dates or as soon as possible thereafter.
Orders
- ["By consent, orders in paragraphs 1 to 8 of the short minutes of order dated 18 March 2009 were made, and the first respondent's undertaking to the court therein was noted." "Order that, by 1 April 2009, the third respondent, by a proper officer of the third respondent, make all proper enquiries and then make a...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment