Bell Quarry Rehabilitation Project Pty Ltd v Lithgow City Council [2022] NSWLEC 123

Bell Quarry Rehabilitation Project Pty Ltd v Lithgow City Council [2022] NSWLEC 123

The application to set down the proposed separate questions was refused because the questions involved mixed matters of fact and law, would not likely resolve or significantly narrow the issues in the substantive proceedings, and their determination was unlikely to facilitate the just, quick, and cheap resolution of the dispute. The potential for delay and fragmentation further weighed against granting the application.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 October 2022
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Appeal / Interlocutory Determination – Application for Separate Questions Hearing
Outcome
Application for separate question hearing refused; Notice of Motion dismissed
Legal Topics
['development Consent' 'separate Questions' 'jurisdictional Thresholds']
['environmental Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['development Consent' 'separate Questions' 'jurisdictional Thresholds']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Class 1 Development Appeal / Interlocutory Determination – Application for Separate Questions Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether separate questions regarding the meaning and application of 'suitable vehicular access' in cl 7.10(e) of Lithgow Local Environmental Plan 2014 should be determined separately in a Class 1 development appeal" 'Whether the proposed separate questions are suitable for separate determination given the mix of factual and legal issues involved']

Ratio Decidendi

The application to set down the proposed separate questions was refused because the questions involved mixed matters of fact and law, would not likely resolve or significantly narrow the issues in the substantive proceedings, and their determination was unlikely to facilitate the just, quick, and cheap resolution of the dispute. The potential for delay and fragmentation further weighed against granting the application.

Court Disposition

Application for separate question hearing refused; Notice of Motion dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application for a hearing of separate questions is refused' 'The Notice of Motion is dismissed' 'Costs of the Notice of Motion are reserved' 'The matter is set down for further directions before the Registrar on 12 October 2022' 'The exhibits on the motion are returned']