In the matter of Bellamy’s Australia Limited [2019] NSWSC 1889
The Court approved the scheme because the evidence established substantial compliance with the convening orders, the omission in the initial dispatch of materials was not material, the scheme was approved by the requisite majorities, excluded shares were not voted, ASIC had no objection, FIRB had confirmed no Commonwealth objection, the scheme was one that an intelligent and honest shareholder properly informed and acting alone might approve, and no matter warranted refusal of approval.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) for Orders Approving a Scheme of Arrangement / Second Court Hearing
- Outcome
- Orders made approving the scheme of arrangement.
- Legal Topics
- ['schemes of Arrangement' 'arrangements and Reconstructions' 'court Approval of Scheme' 'shareholder Meetings' 'foreign Investment Review Board Approval']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) for Orders Approving a Scheme of Arrangement / Second Court Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed scheme of arrangement should be approved under s 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether the statutory voting requirements and other formal requirements for approval of the scheme were satisfied.' 'Whether amendments to the definitions of "Excluded Share" and "Excluded Shareholder" and the description of counterparties to the scheme should be made under s 411(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether an exemption order should be made under s 411(12) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court approved the scheme because the evidence established substantial compliance with the convening orders, the omission in the initial dispatch of materials was not material, the scheme was approved by the requisite majorities, excluded shares were not voted, ASIC had no objection, FIRB had confirmed no Commonwealth objection, the scheme was one that an intelligent and honest shareholder properly informed and acting alone might approve, and no matter warranted refusal of approval.
Court Disposition
Orders made approving the scheme of arrangement.
Orders
- ['Orders under s 411(4) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) approving the proposed scheme of arrangement.' 'Orders under s 411(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) amending the definitions of "Excluded Share" and "Excluded Shareholder" and the description of the counterparties to the scheme.' 'Exemption order under...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment