Watts v Bendigo & Adelaide Bank Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 1429
Entry of information concerning the sequestration order on the National Personal Insolvency Index is not a proceeding under the sequestration order and is required by regulation, so the stay does not prevent such recording.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court / Motion Dismissed on Appeal
- Outcome
- Motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sequestration Order' 'national Personal Insolvency Index' 'stay of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court / Motion Dismissed on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the stay of proceedings under a sequestration order prevents recording of the order on the National Personal Insolvency Index']
Ratio Decidendi
Entry of information concerning the sequestration order on the National Personal Insolvency Index is not a proceeding under the sequestration order and is required by regulation, so the stay does not prevent such recording.
Court Disposition
Motion dismissed
Orders
- ["The appellants' motion filed on 8 November 2010 is dismissed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment