Gittany v R [2019] NSWDC 800
The number of hours of community service imposed (300 hours) was well within range and not manifestly excessive given the deliberate nature of the offending, the significant value of the mural, the lack of entitlement to a sentencing discount, and the appellant's criminal record. No basis was established to interfere with the magistrate's sentencing discretion.
- Parties
- Appellant: Benjamin Gittany; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Criminal / Sentence Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Intentional Damage to Property, Sentence Appeal, Community Service Order, Religious Motivation, Compensation Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benjamin Gittany
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Criminal / Sentence Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 300 hours of community service was manifestly excessive for the offence of intentional damage to property
- 2 Appropriateness of community service order given the circumstances, including religious motivation and offender's background
Ratio Decidendi
The number of hours of community service imposed (300 hours) was well within range and not manifestly excessive given the deliberate nature of the offending, the significant value of the mural, the lack of entitlement to a sentencing discount, and the appellant's criminal record. No basis was established to interfere with the magistrate's sentencing discretion.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against sentence dismissed
- Community Service Order of 300 hours affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment