Raymond v Waverley Council [2004] NSWLEC 446
The amended development application, now incorporating conditions addressing heritage and conservation considerations, is consistent with the council’s development control plan and does not detract from the streetscape or heritage value. Thus, approval is warranted.
- Parties
- Applicant: Benjamin Raymond; Applicant: Yvonne Raymond; Respondent: Waverley Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal upheld; development application approved with conditions
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent, Modification, Impact on Adjoining Properties, Conservation Area
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benjamin Raymond
Applicant
Yvonne Raymond
Applicant
Waverley Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed garage development is appropriate in relation to streetscape and conservation area controls
- 2 Whether the development would impact heritage significance and amenity of adjoining properties
- 3 Whether council's development control plan requirements regarding semi-detached dwellings are met
Ratio Decidendi
The amended development application, now incorporating conditions addressing heritage and conservation considerations, is consistent with the council’s development control plan and does not detract from the streetscape or heritage value. Thus, approval is warranted.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld; development application approved with conditions
Orders
- The appeal, under section 96(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, to amend the consent issued by the Court 31 March 2003, is upheld.
- The application submitted to Waverley Council, and as amended, to modify the consent for a mixed use commercial residential development is approved subject to the consolidated conditions contained in Annexure 'A'.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment