Bennett v Colonial Sugar Refining Company Limited [1911] HCA 41
The facts that the agreement was made by a joint-stock company and was terminable at the will of the company do not take it out of the provisions of the Masters and Servants Act 1861. No sufficient question of law justifies a grant of special leave to appeal.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bennett; Respondent: Colonial Sugar Refining Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 1911
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Special Leave to Appeal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal to the High Court From the Supreme Court of Queensland
- Outcome
- special leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Master and Servant, Definition of Master, Termination of Contract, Agreement Under Masters and Servants Act 1861
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bennett
Appellant
Colonial Sugar Refining Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Special Leave to Appeal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal to the High Court From the Supreme Court of Queensland
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a joint-stock company may be a 'master' under the Masters and Servants Act 1861 (Qld)
- 2 Whether an agreement terminable at the employer's will is within the Act
- 3 Whether reasonable cause for refusal to perform the contract existed
Ratio Decidendi
The facts that the agreement was made by a joint-stock company and was terminable at the will of the company do not take it out of the provisions of the Masters and Servants Act 1861. No sufficient question of law justifies a grant of special leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
special leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Special leave to appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment