Benson McCormack Architects v Manly Council [2013] NSWLEC 1223
Because the applicant's own expert conceded that the development would slightly adversely affect the safety, efficiency and ongoing operation of the classified road due to the designed vehicular access, the Court was not satisfied as required by cl 101(2)(b) of the Infrastructure SEPP, and therefore consent could not be granted.
- Parties
- Applicant: Benson McCormack Architects; Respondent: Manly Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed. Development consent refused.
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent, Classified Road Frontage, Traffic Safety, Infrastructure SEPP
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benson McCormack Architects
Applicant
Manly Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the design of vehicular access to land with frontage to a classified road satisfies cl 101(2)(b) of the Infrastructure SEPP
- 2 Whether the development would adversely affect the safety, efficiency and ongoing operation of the classified road
Ratio Decidendi
Because the applicant's own expert conceded that the development would slightly adversely affect the safety, efficiency and ongoing operation of the classified road due to the designed vehicular access, the Court was not satisfied as required by cl 101(2)(b) of the Infrastructure SEPP, and therefore consent could not be granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed. Development consent refused.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- Development Consent is refused for the construction of a boarding house in accord with development application no: 94/2013 on land known as Lot 5 DP9335 at 232 Sydney Road, Balgowlah.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment