Berem Interiors Pty Limited v Shaya Constructions (NSW) Pty Limited [2007] NSWSC 1340

Berem Interiors Pty Limited v Shaya Constructions (NSW) Pty Limited [2007] NSWSC 1340

The Invitation to Tender was issued by Berem Constructions Pty Limited, the defendant responded to and submitted quotations to Berem Constructions Pty Limited, and there was no evidence of any conversation or arrangement changing the contracting party to Berem Interiors Pty Limited. The invoices naming Berem Interiors did not establish a contractual entitlement against the plaintiff. Because no construction contract or qualifying arrangement existed between the plaintiff and the defendant, an essential precondition to the adjudicator's jurisdiction was absent and the Determination was void for jurisdictional error.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 November 2007
Procedural Posture
Summons Seeking a Declaration That an Adjudication Determination Under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 Is Void / Ex Tempore Judgment
Outcome
Determination void; declaration made.
Legal Topics
['validity of Adjudication Determination' 'jurisdictional Error' 'existence of Construction Contract' 'construction Contract or Other Arrangement' 'procedural Fairness']
['building and Construction' 'security of Payment' 'administrative Law'] ['validity of Adjudication Determination' 'jurisdictional Error' 'existence of Construction Contract' 'construction Contract or Other Arrangement' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Summons Seeking a Declaration That an Adjudication Determination Under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 Is Void / Ex Tempore Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the adjudication determination was void because there was no construction contract between the plaintiff and the first defendant' 'Whether there was an arrangement between the plaintiff and the first defendant within the definition of construction contract in the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999' "Whether absence of a construction contract was a jurisdictional error affecting the adjudicator's determination"]

Ratio Decidendi

The Invitation to Tender was issued by Berem Constructions Pty Limited, the defendant responded to and submitted quotations to Berem Constructions Pty Limited, and there was no evidence of any conversation or arrangement changing the contracting party to Berem Interiors Pty Limited. The invoices naming Berem Interiors did not establish a contractual entitlement against the plaintiff. Because no construction contract or qualifying arrangement existed between the plaintiff and the defendant, an essential precondition to the adjudicator's jurisdiction was absent and the Determination was void for jurisdictional error.

Court Disposition

Determination void; declaration made.

Orders

  • ['Declaration in paragraph 1 of the summons filed in the proceedings made.']