Berhero Pty Ltd v Senibina Sentral SDN BHD [2024] NSWSC 459

Berhero Pty Ltd v Senibina Sentral SDN BHD [2024] NSWSC 459

The Malaysian registration of charge proceedings would require determination of substantially the same issues as the New South Wales proceedings, including whether binding agreements existed and whether money was owed under them, and were likely to be heard first, thereby creating at least issue estoppels and frustrating the defendants' defences in this Court, including Australian Consumer Law matters. This Court was not an inappropriate forum, could make orders in respect of Malaysian land under the Jurisdiction of Courts (Foreign Land) Act 1989 (NSW), and the plaintiff had not shown that it could obtain anything in Malaysia that it could not obtain in New South Wales. The plaintiff's...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 April 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedure — Anti Suit Injunctions / Notice of Motion Filed 23 February 2024 Seeking Interlocutory Orders Restraining the Plaintiff From Continuing or Commencing Foreign Proceedings
Outcome
Anti-suit injunction granted; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendants' costs of the relevant hearing.
Legal Topics
['anti Suit Injunctions' 'foreign Proceedings' 'vexatious and Oppressive Proceedings' 'issue Estoppel' 'comity' 'foreign Land' 'balance of Convenience' 'interlocutory Injunctions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil Procedure — Anti Suit Injunctions / Notice of Motion Filed 23 February 2024 Seeking Interlocutory Orders Restraining the Plaintiff From Continuing or Commencing Foreign Proceedings

  1. 1 ['Whether the Malaysian registration of charge proceedings interfered with, or had a tendency to interfere with, the integrity of the proceedings in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.' "Whether the plaintiff's continuation of Malaysian proceedings was vexatious or oppressive where substantially overlapping issues were already before this Court." 'Whether this Court was an appropriate forum to determine issues involving alleged agreements governed by New South Wales law and land in Malaysia.' 'Whether the plaintiff could obtain in the New South Wales proceedings the relief it sought in the Malaysian registration of charge proceedings.' "Whether the plaintiff's proposed undertakings sufficiently addressed the prejudice to the defendants if the Malaysian proceedings were determined first." 'Whether the balance of convenience favoured granting an anti-suit injunction.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Malaysian registration of charge proceedings would require determination of substantially the same issues as the New South Wales proceedings, including whether binding agreements existed and whether money was owed under them, and were likely to be heard first, thereby creating at least issue estoppels and frustrating the defendants' defences in this Court, including Australian Consumer Law matters. This Court was not an inappropriate forum, could make orders in respect of Malaysian land under the Jurisdiction of Courts (Foreign Land) Act 1989 (NSW), and the plaintiff had not shown that it could obtain anything in Malaysia that it could not obtain in New South Wales. The plaintiff's...

Court Disposition

Anti-suit injunction granted; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendants' costs of the relevant hearing.

Orders

  • ['The Court notes that the first, second, fourth and fifth defendants give the usual undertaking as to damages.' 'The plaintiff, by itself, its servants, its agents or howsoever otherwise, is restrained until further order, from taking any further step directly or indirectly in Proceedings WA-24NCvC-5741-12/2023 in...