Berhero Pty Ltd v Hinds (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 1214
The defendants did not achieve a better outcome than if the Calderbank offer had been accepted because the cross-claim, the basis of the offer, was not pressed and was dismissed with costs. Therefore, no special costs order is warranted.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Berhero Pty Ltd; First Defendant: Paul Hinds; Second Defendant: RV Developments Australia Pty Ltd; Third Defendant: RV Developments Australia Pty Ltd as Trustee for RV Developments Australia Unit Trust
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Special Costs Order / Post Trial Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Application for special costs order dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Calderbank Offer, Jurisdictional Limit, Special Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Berhero Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
Paul Hinds
First Defendant
RV Developments Australia Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
RV Developments Australia Pty Ltd as Trustee for RV Developments Australia Unit Trust
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Special Costs Order / Post Trial Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants were entitled to a special costs order under s 98 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) in light of an unaccepted Calderbank offer
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants did not achieve a better outcome than if the Calderbank offer had been accepted because the cross-claim, the basis of the offer, was not pressed and was dismissed with costs. Therefore, no special costs order is warranted.
Court Disposition
Application for special costs order dismissed.
Orders
- Dismiss the defendants' Notice of Motion filed on 11 September 2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment