BERKELEY CHALLENGE PTY LTD v BLIGHT; TEMPO SERVICES PTY LTD v BLIGHT [1996] NSWCA 46
The Court of Appeal's previous judgment was set aside because it was made on a false premise; the judgment relied on notes rather than the certified formal judgment of the court below, and parties are entitled to a full determination on the actual judgment.
- Parties
- Appellant: Berkeley Challenge Pty Ltd; Appellant: Tempo Services Pty Ltd; Respondent: Blight
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application to Set Aside Judgment of Court of Appeal Prior to Entry
- Outcome
- Judgment of Court of Appeal (dated 18 July 1996) set aside; appeal to be relisted and reheard on the basis of the correct (formal) judgment.
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Judicial Reasons, Setting Aside Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Berkeley Challenge Pty Ltd
Appellant
Tempo Services Pty Ltd
Appellant
Blight
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application to Set Aside Judgment of Court of Appeal Prior to Entry
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judgment of the Court of Appeal should be set aside because it was based on notes and not the formal judgment of the trial court
- 2 Whether parties are entitled to a determination of the appeal on the formal judgment
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal's previous judgment was set aside because it was made on a false premise; the judgment relied on notes rather than the certified formal judgment of the court below, and parties are entitled to a full determination on the actual judgment.
Court Disposition
Judgment of Court of Appeal (dated 18 July 1996) set aside; appeal to be relisted and reheard on the basis of the correct (formal) judgment.
Orders
- That the appeal be listed for hearing in the next Compensation Court list.
- That the stay in place will continue until the determination of the Court of Appeal hearing, or further order of this court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment