Vinci v Ku-ring-gai Council [2017] NSWLEC 1280
Where the parties reach agreement at conciliation conference and the Court is satisfied under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979, it must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement, without undertaking a merit assessment.
- Parties
- Applicant: Bernadette Annette Vinci; Respondent: Ku-ring-gai Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (class 1 Proceedings) / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions; applicant to pay nominal costs.
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Conciliation Conference, Court Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bernadette Annette Vinci
Applicant
Ku-ring-gai Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (class 1 Proceedings) / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the parties’ agreement at conciliation conference could be embodied in court orders under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Ratio Decidendi
Where the parties reach agreement at conciliation conference and the Court is satisfied under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979, it must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement, without undertaking a merit assessment.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions; applicant to pay nominal costs.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development Application No. DA0561/16 for the demolition of an existing dwelling and the construction of a new two storey dwelling containing four bedrooms and a double garage, swimming pool and associated landscaping, retaining walls and cabana within a heritage conservation area at 9 Burns Road, Wahroonga, is...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment