Allan v R (No 2) [2011] NSWCCA 27
The power under s 59(1) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 to vary commencement dates of sentences is not confined to cases where sentences are to commence in the future or consecutive only; variation can be made where necessary to give effect to the reduction of a prior sentence, provided it is appropriate in the circumstances.
- Parties
- Applicant: Bernard Allan; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentence Variation/appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Application allowed; commencement dates of second sentences varied as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Application of S 59 Crimes (sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, Variation of Sentence Commencement Dates
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bernard Allan
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Variation/appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s 59 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 empowers the Court to vary the commencement dates of sentences where there is no hiatus period between sentences.
- 2 Proper interpretation and application of s 59 regarding the varying of sentence commencement dates.
Ratio Decidendi
The power under s 59(1) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 to vary commencement dates of sentences is not confined to cases where sentences are to commence in the future or consecutive only; variation can be made where necessary to give effect to the reduction of a prior sentence, provided it is appropriate in the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; commencement dates of second sentences varied as specified.
Orders
- Break, enter and steal: 3 years imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of 2 years commencing 2 January 2010 and expiring 1 January 2012 with a balance of term of 1 year expiring on 1 January 2013.
- Assault occasioning actual bodily harm: imprisonment for a fixed term of 12 months commencing 2 January 2010 and expiring on 1 January 2011.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment