Grinberg v Byron Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 746
The proposal is not compatible in character with local development, does not promote a low density residential character, and is not consistent with the character and amenity of the locality as required by Byron Development Control Plan 2002. The proposed dwelling's bulk, scale and siting relative to the existing dwelling lead to unacceptable impacts under the planning controls.
- Parties
- Applicant: Bernard Grinberg; Respondent: Byron Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Dual Occupancy, Residential Development, Local Planning Controls, Amenity Impact
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bernard Grinberg
Applicant
Byron Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed development has an unacceptable impact on the character of the area
- 2 Whether the proposed development creates unacceptable amenity impacts on adjoining properties
- 3 Whether the proposed development provides adequate parking for the existing dwelling
Ratio Decidendi
The proposal is not compatible in character with local development, does not promote a low density residential character, and is not consistent with the character and amenity of the locality as required by Byron Development Control Plan 2002. The proposed dwelling's bulk, scale and siting relative to the existing dwelling lead to unacceptable impacts under the planning controls.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- Development Application DA 10.2007.63.1 for the erection of a new dwelling to create a detached dual occupancy development at 89 Wordsworth Street Byron Bay is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment