Everts v Liepins (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1598
Given the respondent's failure to comply with court orders regarding estate administration and to appear at hearings, together with the usual principle that the successful party should have its costs, the respondent is ordered to personally pay the applicant's costs of the notice of motion. If any costs are paid from the estate, the respondent must reimburse the estate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion Regarding Costs / Post Judgment (costs Hearing)
- Outcome
- Applicant's costs of the notice of motion to be paid personally by the respondent; respondent to reimburse the estate if costs are paid out of it; no order as to respondent's costs in resisting the motion or compliance; service requirements for orders and reasons.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs of Notice of Motion Against Executor' 'failure to Comply With Court Orders' "executor's Personal Liability for Costs"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion Regarding Costs / Post Judgment (costs Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Should the respondent, as executor, personally pay the applicant's costs of the notice of motion?" 'Should the respondent be permitted any costs out of the estate for resisting the notice of motion or compliance with court orders?']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the respondent's failure to comply with court orders regarding estate administration and to appear at hearings, together with the usual principle that the successful party should have its costs, the respondent is ordered to personally pay the applicant's costs of the notice of motion. If any costs are paid from the estate, the respondent must reimburse the estate.
Court Disposition
Applicant's costs of the notice of motion to be paid personally by the respondent; respondent to reimburse the estate if costs are paid out of it; no order as to respondent's costs in resisting the motion or compliance; service requirements for orders and reasons.
Orders
- ["Respondent to personally pay applicant's costs for the notice of motion filed on 12 April 2022. To the extent any costs are paid from the estate, respondent must reimburse the estate." "No order as to respondent's costs relating to resisting the applicant's notice of motion, or compliance with relevant orders."...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment