Besser Industries (NT) Pty Ltd v Steelcon Constructions Pty Ltd [1995] FCA 180
There is no genuine dispute as to the existence of the debt, but there is a genuine dispute as to the amount claimed. The admitted error in the amount justifies varying the statutory demand to the amount correctly certified by progress certificates. Mere defects, including failures in the affidavit, are not sufficient to set aside the demand absent substantial injustice.
- Parties
- Applicant: Besser Industries (NT) Pty Ltd; Respondent: Steelcon Constructions Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Final Judgment on Application to Vary Statutory Demand
- Outcome
- Statutory demand varied; demand remains in effect as varied.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Genuine Dispute, Progress Payments, Defective Statutory Demand, Affidavit Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Besser Industries (NT) Pty Ltd
Applicant
Steelcon Constructions Pty Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Final Judgment on Application to Vary Statutory Demand
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is a genuine dispute as to existence of the debt
- 2 Whether a lump sum contract price is inconsistent with progress payments
- 3 Whether admitted error in the amount claimed is a defect justifying the demand being set aside
Ratio Decidendi
There is no genuine dispute as to the existence of the debt, but there is a genuine dispute as to the amount claimed. The admitted error in the amount justifies varying the statutory demand to the amount correctly certified by progress certificates. Mere defects, including failures in the affidavit, are not sufficient to set aside the demand absent substantial injustice.
Court Disposition
Statutory demand varied; demand remains in effect as varied.
Orders
- Statutory demand varied by substituting "$678,660.00" for "$799,283.30" in para 1.
- Demand to have effect, as so varied, from service date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment