Betfair Pty Limited v Racing New South Wales (No 8) [2009] FCA 1161
If a client communicates with their lawyer for the dominant purpose of obtaining legal advice, that communication remains privileged even if it refers to another party's privileged advice; thus the second page of document 24 remains privileged and protected from production.
- Parties
- Applicant: Betfair Pty Limited; First Respondent: Racing New South Wales; Second Respondent: Harness Racing New South Wales; Intervening: State of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Interlocutory Decision on Privilege Objection
- Outcome
- Ruling in favour of the State's claim of privilege over the relevant document parts; orders varied to exclude those parts from production.
- Legal Topics
- Legal Professional Privilege, Document Production
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Betfair Pty Limited
Applicant
Racing New South Wales
First Respondent
Harness Racing New South Wales
Second Respondent
State of New South Wales
Intervening
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory Decision on Privilege Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether legal professional privilege attaches to a document where a client's question incorporates a communication over which another person may have privilege
Ratio Decidendi
If a client communicates with their lawyer for the dominant purpose of obtaining legal advice, that communication remains privileged even if it refers to another party's privileged advice; thus the second page of document 24 remains privileged and protected from production.
Court Disposition
Ruling in favour of the State's claim of privilege over the relevant document parts; orders varied to exclude those parts from production.
Orders
- The orders made on 8 October 2004 are varied by inserting as an item under the heading 'Exhibit CM1' in Order 1: 'Document 24: the parts highlighted pink in Exhibit CM1.'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment