Gallagher v AAG Labour Services Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1753
The applicant must provide further and better particulars of her claim, in particular the basis on which total hours worked and unpaid hours have been calculated, to the extent practicable, as the statement of claim does not currently give the respondents fair notice of the case they must meet.
- Parties
- Applicant: Beth Gallagher; First Respondent / Cross Claimant: AAG Labour Services Pty Ltd (ACN 126 217 294); Second Respondent: Marcus Roman Elgin-Stuczynski; Cross Respondent: Hayden Russell
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Orders for Further and Better Particulars
- Outcome
- Application for further and better particulars granted in part; applicant ordered to provide particulars; respondents' interlocutory application otherwise dismissed; costs reserved; cross-respondent given leave to file re-amended defence; matters referred to mediation.
- Legal Topics
- Particulars of Pleadings, Fair Work Act, Employee Records and Payslips, Burden of Proof in Underpayment Claims, Cross Claim for Indemnity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Beth Gallagher
Applicant
AAG Labour Services Pty Ltd (ACN 126 217 294)
First Respondent / Cross Claimant
Marcus Roman Elgin-Stuczynski
Second Respondent
Hayden Russell
Cross Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Orders for Further and Better Particulars
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant must provide further and better particulars of hours worked as alleged in the statement of claim
- 2 Sufficiency of current pleadings to give fair notice of the case to be met by respondents
- 3 Impact of reversal of onus under s 557C Fair Work Act on the requirement to plead particulars
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant must provide further and better particulars of her claim, in particular the basis on which total hours worked and unpaid hours have been calculated, to the extent practicable, as the statement of claim does not currently give the respondents fair notice of the case they must meet.
Court Disposition
Application for further and better particulars granted in part; applicant ordered to provide particulars; respondents' interlocutory application otherwise dismissed; costs reserved; cross-respondent given leave to file re-amended defence; matters referred to mediation.
Orders
- Applicant to provide, by 1 February 2021, particulars of days worked, days not worked, hours worked on any specified days on L2 and/or L3 during the Term, and particulars of calculation of 'Total hours worked' as per Schedule B.
- Respondents' interlocutory application dated 16 October 2020 otherwise dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment