Nield v Mathieson [2014] FCA 29
Leave to appeal should be granted because there are factual and legal issues warranting Full Court attention and a serious risk of substantial injustice to the applicants if leave is refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal Granted; Stay of Original Orders Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; operation of orders stayed pending appeal; costs reserved
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Orders' 'employment Relationship' 'substantial Injustice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal Granted; Stay of Original Orders Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted from interlocutory orders of the Federal Circuit Court' 'Whether the orders appealed from are interlocutory or final' 'Whether there is sufficient doubt attending the judgment to warrant appeal' 'Whether serious or substantial injustice would be occasioned if leave were refused']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal should be granted because there are factual and legal issues warranting Full Court attention and a serious risk of substantial injustice to the applicants if leave is refused.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; operation of orders stayed pending appeal; costs reserved
Orders
- ['Applicants have leave to appeal from Orders 1, 2 and 3 made by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia in proceeding MLG 650/2012 on 23 December 2013, to be filed by 4.00 pm on 4 February 2014.' 'Operation of Orders 1, 2 and 3 made on 23 December 2013 be stayed pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment