Rahman v North Sydney Council [2019] NSWLEC 1363
As the parties agreed to delete conditions C27 and G12 and proposed new conditions, and the Court was satisfied the modified development is substantially the same and within its proper jurisdiction, the orders were made accordingly.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (modification Application) / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent modified; no order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Application' 'development Consent' 'conciliation Conference']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal (modification Application) / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether conditions C27 and G12 should be deleted from Development Consent No. 316/15' 'Whether the modified development is substantially the same as the approved development']
Ratio Decidendi
As the parties agreed to delete conditions C27 and G12 and proposed new conditions, and the Court was satisfied the modified development is substantially the same and within its proper jurisdiction, the orders were made accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent modified; no order as to costs
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld and Development Consent No. 316/15 is modified as follows: (a) conditions C27 and G12 are deleted from the conditions of consent; (b) the new conditions as set out in Annexure A be inserted to the conditions of consent.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment