Betta Products (Australia) Pty Ltd v Crampton [2009] FCA 520

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 20 May 2009
Procedural Posture: Corporations Litigation / Derivative Action Application / Application for Leave to Commence Derivative Proceedings and Related Interlocutory Orders
Outcome: Leave to bring derivative proceedings on behalf of Betta Products granted; associated interlocutory orders made; costs reserved; case listed for further directions.
Legal Topics: ['derivative Actions' 'standing of Shareholders' "directors' Duties" 'company Shareholding Disputes' 'leave to Bring Proceedings on Behalf of Company']

['corporations Law'] ['derivative Actions' 'standing of Shareholders' "directors' Duties" 'company Shareholding Disputes' 'leave to Bring Proceedings on Behalf of Company']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Corporations Litigation / Derivative Action Application / Application for Leave to Commence Derivative Proceedings and Related Interlocutory Orders

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether applicant shareholder should have leave to bring proceedings on behalf of Betta Products under ss 236 and 237 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)' "Whether the criteria for leave in s 237(2) are satisfied, including probable inaction by company, applicant's good faith, whether action is in best interests of company, serious question to be tried, and notice requirements" 'Whether share issues and transfers, use of company funds, and recorded loan accounts raise serious questions for trial']

Ratio Decidendi

Markwood Court, as a shareholder, satisfied the statutory criteria under s 237(2) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for leave to bring proceedings on behalf of Betta Products: it was probable Betta Products would not itself bring the proceedings, Markwood Court acted in good faith, the proceedings were in the best interests of the company, there were serious questions to be tried regarding share issues, use of funds, and accounting, and notice requirements were met. Leave was granted nunc pro tunc to enable Markwood Court to proceed in the name of Betta Products.

Court Disposition

Leave to bring derivative proceedings on behalf of Betta Products granted; associated interlocutory orders made; costs reserved; case listed for further directions.

Orders

['Proceedings be listed for further directions at 9:30am on 18 June 2009.' 'Costs reserved.' 'Liberty to apply.' 'Material filed in VID 176 of 2009 be taken as material filed in VID 338 of 2009.' 'Markwood Court Pty Ltd have leave to issue proceeding VID 176 of 2009 in the name of Betta Products (Australia) Pty Ltd...

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.