Bettergrow Pty Limited v NSW Electricity Networks Operations Pty Ltd as trustee for NSW Electricity Networks Operations Trust t/as TransGrid (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 514
None of the defendants owed Bettergrow a non-delegable or ordinary duty of care to prevent the delivery of asbestos-contaminated waste. The facts did not support extending non-delegable duties to this principal/contractor scenario, as Bettergrow was not particularly vulnerable and had means to protect itself. There was no breach of any pleaded contractual term by Online, and no causatively relevant breach by any party. Even if any duty had existed, there was insufficient evidence of breach or causation. Thus, Bettergrow's claims failed.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Bettergrow Pty Limited; First Defendant: NSW Electricity Networks Operations Pty Ltd as trustee for NSW Electricity Networks Operations Trust t/as TransGrid; Second Defendant: Powercor Network Services Pty Ltd; Third Defendant: TTR Construction & Excavation Pty Limited (In Liquidation); Fourth Defendant: On-Line Pipe & Cable Locating Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Non Delegable Duties of Care, Duty of Care, Breach of Duty, Causation, Terms Implied in Contract, Amendment of Pleadings, Cross Claims, Economic Loss, Contributory Negligence, Apportionment of Responsibility, Statutory Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bettergrow Pty Limited
Plaintiff
NSW Electricity Networks Operations Pty Ltd as trustee for NSW Electricity Networks Operations Trust t/as TransGrid
First Defendant
Powercor Network Services Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
TTR Construction & Excavation Pty Limited (In Liquidation)
Third Defendant
On-Line Pipe & Cable Locating Pty Limited
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants owed Bettergrow a duty of care (non-delegable or ordinary) to prevent delivery of asbestos-contaminated waste
- 2 Whether the principal (TransGrid) can be liable for the acts of its contractor and sub-contractors
- 3 Whether any duty was breached by the defendants
Ratio Decidendi
None of the defendants owed Bettergrow a non-delegable or ordinary duty of care to prevent the delivery of asbestos-contaminated waste. The facts did not support extending non-delegable duties to this principal/contractor scenario, as Bettergrow was not particularly vulnerable and had means to protect itself. There was no breach of any pleaded contractual term by Online, and no causatively relevant breach by any party. Even if any duty had existed, there was insufficient evidence of breach or causation. Thus, Bettergrow's claims failed.
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed
Orders
- The proceedings be dismissed
- The plaintiff pay the costs of the first, second and fourth defendants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment