Ferderer v Cunninghame [2021] NSWLEC 1097
The Court was not satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the Leyland Cypress trees caused the damage to the applicant's sheds or water tank filters. The evidentiary burden was not discharged, and the zoning was found to have sufficient residential character to enliven jurisdiction, but no remedy was warranted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (nsw) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- ['damage Caused by Trees' 'zoning' 'evidentiary Burden' 'remedies']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (nsw) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the land is within a zone to which the Trees Act applies' "Whether trees have caused damage to the applicant's property" 'Whether the evidentiary burden was discharged by the applicant' 'Appropriate remedies if damage is established']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was not satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the Leyland Cypress trees caused the damage to the applicant's sheds or water tank filters. The evidentiary burden was not discharged, and the zoning was found to have sufficient residential character to enliven jurisdiction, but no remedy was warranted.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- ['The application is refused.' 'The exhibits are returned apart from Exhibits A and B.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment