Betty Sbragi v Helen Barac [2014] NSWSC 404
The Deed did not make time of the essence at the expiry of eight weeks; the obligation to complete did not arise immediately upon that date, and in any event, no sufficient evidence of breach or loss was presented by the defendants. The claim for damages could not be maintained under s 73 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW).
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Betty Sbragi; First Defendant: Helen Barac; Second Defendant: Sylvia Mason
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion in Equity Proceedings / Ruling on Notice of Motion Post Settlement
- Outcome
- Notice of motion dismissed; costs to plaintiff on indemnity basis; proceedings dismissed with no other order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Time of the Essence in Conveyancing, Construction of Settlement Deed, Breach of Contract, Damages, Jurisdiction Under Civil Procedure Act 2005 (nsw) S 73
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Betty Sbragi
Plaintiff
Helen Barac
First Defendant
Sylvia Mason
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion in Equity Proceedings / Ruling on Notice of Motion Post Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether time was of the essence for settlement under the Deed
- 2 Whether defendants were entitled to damages for breach of settlement terms
- 3 Whether section 73 Civil Procedure Act allowed damages claim for breach of settlement
Ratio Decidendi
The Deed did not make time of the essence at the expiry of eight weeks; the obligation to complete did not arise immediately upon that date, and in any event, no sufficient evidence of breach or loss was presented by the defendants. The claim for damages could not be maintained under s 73 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Notice of motion dismissed; costs to plaintiff on indemnity basis; proceedings dismissed with no other order as to costs.
Orders
- The defendants' notice of motion dated 23 December 2013 is to be dismissed.
- The defendants are to pay the plaintiff's costs of the notice of motion dated 23 December 2013 on an indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment