Beverley Carol Hogan v Lynette Dorothy Clarke & Anor [2002] NSWSC 386
The relationship between the plaintiff and the deceased was so ruptured and lacking in contact over a long period of years that, applying the prevailing community standards as required by the Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW), the provision made by the deceased was not inadequate for the plaintiff's proper maintenance, education and advancement in life; accordingly, the application must be dismissed.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Beverley Carol Hogan; 1st Defendant: Lynette Dorothy Clarke; 2nd Defendant: John Mulvaney
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Family Provision Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Family Provision Act 1982 (nsw), Order for Maintenance, Education and Advancement, Adequacy of Testamentary Disposition, Relationship and Contact Between Applicant and Deceased, Community Standards in Family Provision
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Beverley Carol Hogan
Plaintiff
Lynette Dorothy Clarke
1st Defendant
John Mulvaney
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the provision made for the plaintiff out of the deceased's estate was inadequate for her proper maintenance, education and advancement in life under the Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW)
- 2 What weight should be given to the relationship and degree of contact between the applicant daughter and the deceased mother
- 3 Application of prevailing community standards in determining family provision claims
Ratio Decidendi
The relationship between the plaintiff and the deceased was so ruptured and lacking in contact over a long period of years that, applying the prevailing community standards as required by the Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW), the provision made by the deceased was not inadequate for the plaintiff's proper maintenance, education and advancement in life; accordingly, the application must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application is dismissed; order to be made upon the bringing in of short minutes of order. Costs are reserved for submissions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment