Bexley Village Pty Limited v Bayside Council [2018] NSWLEC 1174
The proceedings were disposed of in accordance with the agreement between the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, as the presiding Commissioner was satisfied that the decision was one the Court could have made.
- Parties
- Applicant: Bexley Village Pty Limited; Respondent: Bayside Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference, Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld, development application approved subject to conditions, costs awarded to Council
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Conciliation Conference, Section 34 Agreement, Height of Buildings Control, Voluntary Planning Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bexley Village Pty Limited
Applicant
Bayside Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference, Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether agreement reached under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 should be adopted by the Court
- 2 Whether the amended development application and supporting documents should be relied upon
- 3 Whether variation to Height of Buildings control under clause 4.3 of Rockdale Local Environmental Plan 2011 should be upheld
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings were disposed of in accordance with the agreement between the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, as the presiding Commissioner was satisfied that the decision was one the Court could have made.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld, development application approved subject to conditions, costs awarded to Council
Orders
- Leave granted to rely on amended plans and documents in condition 2 of Annexure A.
- Clause 4.6 written request to vary Height of Buildings control under clause 4.3 of Rockdale LEP 2011 is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment