Bezzina Developers Pty Limited v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 615
The Court should award the applicant its costs of the proceedings except for those costs incurred in relation to the directions hearings and the part of the claim for loss attributable to disturbance regarding mortgage costs and interest. The respondent is entitled to the costs of those defined issues, as the applicant failed to prosecute those elements properly, thereby causing unnecessary costs for the respondent. Costs related to alternative schemes form part of a legitimate process and are not subject to a special order.
- Parties
- Applicant: Bezzina Developers Pty Limited; Respondent: Leichhardt Municipal Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application After Land Acquisition Compensation Proceedings / Post Judgment Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Special costs orders made: respondent to pay applicant's costs except specifically excluded issues, and each party to pay their own costs regarding costs notices of motion.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Compulsory Acquisition, Just Terms Compensation, Loss Attributable to Disturbance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bezzina Developers Pty Limited
Applicant
Leichhardt Municipal Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Costs Application After Land Acquisition Compensation Proceedings / Post Judgment Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a special costs order should be made in respect of defined issues between the parties
- 2 Which party should bear costs relating to disturbance claims and specific directions hearings
- 3 Appropriateness of awarding costs for evidence relating to alternative schemes
Ratio Decidendi
The Court should award the applicant its costs of the proceedings except for those costs incurred in relation to the directions hearings and the part of the claim for loss attributable to disturbance regarding mortgage costs and interest. The respondent is entitled to the costs of those defined issues, as the applicant failed to prosecute those elements properly, thereby causing unnecessary costs for the respondent. Costs related to alternative schemes form part of a legitimate process and are not subject to a special order.
Court Disposition
Special costs orders made: respondent to pay applicant's costs except specifically excluded issues, and each party to pay their own costs regarding costs notices of motion.
Orders
- Respondent to pay applicant's costs of the proceedings, except for costs of specified directions hearings and the claim for loss attributable to disturbance in respect of mortgage costs and interest.
- Applicant to pay respondent's costs of specified directions hearings and the claim for loss attributable to disturbance in respect of mortgage costs and interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment