BFC v The Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 90
On the totality of the evidence, including expert risk assessment and the applicant's conduct since offending, the Tribunal was satisfied that BFC does not pose a risk to the safety of children and should not be treated as a disqualified person under the Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Administrative Review / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Check' 'disqualification Due to Criminal Conviction' 'risk Assessment for Child Related Work']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Administrative Review / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether BFC should be treated as a disqualified person under the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act, 2012 due to prior convictions for incest' 'Whether BFC presents a risk to the safety of children for the purposes of an enabling order']
Ratio Decidendi
On the totality of the evidence, including expert risk assessment and the applicant's conduct since offending, the Tribunal was satisfied that BFC does not pose a risk to the safety of children and should not be treated as a disqualified person under the Act.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- ['The Tribunal declares that BFC is not to be treated as a disqualified person for purposes of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act, 2012 in respect of the 3 incest offences found proved by the Supreme Court at Armidale on 17 November 1982.' "The Children's Guardian must grant BFC a Working with Children...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment