BFO v Commissioner of Victims Rights [2014] NSWCATAD 175
Clause 5(3) of Schedule 2 of the VRSA explicitly limits special grants to claims lodged within the 'prescribed period' (2 years after the act of violence or after turning 18). BFO's historical claims did not meet these timeframes, and although leave was granted to lodge out of time for other forms of support, the special grant eligibility is strictly confined to applications within the prescribed period, with no discretion for extension. Accordingly, BFO cannot receive a special grant under the transitional provision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Tribunal Determination After Internal Review
- Outcome
- Applications for administrative review dismissed; decisions of the Senior Assessor affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- ['victims Compensation Eligibility' 'statutory Interpretation' 'transitional Provisions' 'limitation Periods']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Tribunal Determination After Internal Review
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether BFO is eligible for a special grant under Clause 5(3) of Schedule 2 of the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 given the date of lodging her claims' "Interpretation of 'prescribed period' in the transitional provisions of the Act"]
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 5(3) of Schedule 2 of the VRSA explicitly limits special grants to claims lodged within the 'prescribed period' (2 years after the act of violence or after turning 18). BFO's historical claims did not meet these timeframes, and although leave was granted to lodge out of time for other forms of support, the special grant eligibility is strictly confined to applications within the prescribed period, with no discretion for extension. Accordingly, BFO cannot receive a special grant under the transitional provision.
Court Disposition
Applications for administrative review dismissed; decisions of the Senior Assessor affirmed.
Orders
- ['The decision made by the Senior Assessor upon Internal Review on 2 January 2014 (in each claim) is affirmed.' 'In each matter the application is dismissed.' 'In each matter there is no order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment