BFT v NSW Office of Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 159
The Applicant has established, on the balance of probabilities and with regard to all mandatory statutory matters, that he does not pose a risk to the safety of children, given passage of time since offence, abstinence from alcohol, no further convictions for 18 years, credible psychological evaluation, and stable provision of care for grandchildren.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Enabling Order Under Child Protection (working With Children) Act 2012 / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Clearance' 'disqualifying Conviction' 'enabling Order' 'risk to Children']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Enabling Order Under Child Protection (working With Children) Act 2012 / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant poses a risk to the safety of children for the purposes of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012' 'Whether the applicant should be declared not to be treated as a disqualified person in respect of his conviction for rape']
Ratio Decidendi
The Applicant has established, on the balance of probabilities and with regard to all mandatory statutory matters, that he does not pose a risk to the safety of children, given passage of time since offence, abstinence from alcohol, no further convictions for 18 years, credible psychological evaluation, and stable provision of care for grandchildren.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- ['Declare that the applicant not be treated as a disqualified person for the purposes of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 in respect of the offence of rape, of which he was convicted on 7 November 1978.' "Pursuant to s.28(6) of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012, the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment