BG v R [2012] NSWCCA 139
There was ample evidence for the jury to convict; the delay and imprecision in the complainant's evidence were explained by the facts and do not undermine credibility. There was no miscarriage of justice in the discharge of the juror or in the continuation of the trial with 11 jurors, as there was insufficient evidence to conclude the discharged juror would have acquitted and no procedural error sufficient to set aside the verdict.
- Parties
- Applicant: BG; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Conviction, Sexual Assault Offences, Jury Procedure, Assessment of Evidence, Unreasonable Verdict, Discharge of Juror, Majority Verdicts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BG
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the jury’s verdict was unreasonable or unsupported by evidence
- 2 Whether there was a miscarriage of justice due to the discharge of a juror and continuation with 11 jurors
Ratio Decidendi
There was ample evidence for the jury to convict; the delay and imprecision in the complainant's evidence were explained by the facts and do not undermine credibility. There was no miscarriage of justice in the discharge of the juror or in the continuation of the trial with 11 jurors, as there was insufficient evidence to conclude the discharged juror would have acquitted and no procedural error sufficient to set aside the verdict.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal granted
Orders
- Grant leave to appeal.
- Order that the appeal be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment