BG v R [2010] NSWCCA 301
Counsel for the appellant was correct that s 293 Criminal Procedure Act precluded cross-examination on the complainant's 1997 statements because they disclosed sexual experience or activity not within the statutory exceptions as to timing or connected circumstances. The application of s 293 did not result in an unfair trial. Further, having examined the evidence, it was open to the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt as to the appellant's guilt, paying full regard to the jury's advantage in seeing and hearing the complainant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sexual Offences' 'evidence Admissibility' 'credibility of Complainant']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether failure to cross-examine the complainant about the content of statements made in July 1997 resulted in an unfair trial' 'Whether the verdicts of guilty were unreasonable and against the weight of the evidence']
Ratio Decidendi
Counsel for the appellant was correct that s 293 Criminal Procedure Act precluded cross-examination on the complainant's 1997 statements because they disclosed sexual experience or activity not within the statutory exceptions as to timing or connected circumstances. The application of s 293 did not result in an unfair trial. Further, having examined the evidence, it was open to the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt as to the appellant's guilt, paying full regard to the jury's advantage in seeing and hearing the complainant.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal against conviction is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment