BGD v Commissioner for Victims Rights [2014] NSWCATAD 181
Time was extended for the application, but the application was dismissed because no internal review had occurred and the statutory exceptions in section 55(4) of the Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 were not satisfied. The Commissioner had not unreasonably refused the late internal review because section 49(2) of the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 used mandatory language and conferred no discretion to accept a late internal review. It was also not necessary to deal with the application to protect BGD's interests because the substantive claim for a special grant would fail: clause 5(3) of Schedule 2 limited eligibility to applications that would have been duly lodged within...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review of Victims Support Decision / Application for Administrative Review; Extension of Time and Threshold Jurisdiction Issues Considered
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; time to appeal extended; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['victims Support Recognition Payment' 'special Grant Under Schedule 2 Clause 5(3) of the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013' 'internal Review Precondition' 'extension of Time' 'beneficial Legislation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review of Victims Support Decision / Application for Administrative Review; Extension of Time and Threshold Jurisdiction Issues Considered
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether time should be extended for BGD to lodge the application for administrative review.' 'Whether the Tribunal could deal with the application despite no internal review having occurred under section 49 of the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013.' 'Whether BGD was eligible for a special grant of $5,000 under clause 5(3) of Schedule 2 to the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013.' 'Whether a beneficial construction of the legislation permitted the Tribunal to depart from the prescribed lodgement requirements.']
Ratio Decidendi
Time was extended for the application, but the application was dismissed because no internal review had occurred and the statutory exceptions in section 55(4) of the Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 were not satisfied. The Commissioner had not unreasonably refused the late internal review because section 49(2) of the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 used mandatory language and conferred no discretion to accept a late internal review. It was also not necessary to deal with the application to protect BGD's interests because the substantive claim for a special grant would fail: clause 5(3) of Schedule 2 limited eligibility to applications that would have been duly lodged within...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; time to appeal extended; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['I extend time for BGD to appeal to the Tribunal until 5:00pm 26 March 2014.' 'The application is dismissed.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment