BGF v Commissioner for Victims Rights [2014] NSWCATAD 77
BGF was convicted of two counts of assault which constituted related acts of violence, but compensation awarded covered both related and unrelated acts, and was not apportioned. Without clear compensation for acts for which BGF was convicted, there is no relevant offence as required by the statutory scheme, thus restitution is unavailable.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Decision reversed; order for restitution not made.
- Legal Topics
- ['restitution Orders' 'recovery of Compensation' 'relevant Offence Definition' 'series of Related Acts of Violence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether restitution order against BGF can be sustained under the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013' 'Whether compensation awarded relates to a relevant offence for which BGF was convicted' "Interpretation of 'relevant offence' and 'series of related acts' in the statutory scheme"]
Ratio Decidendi
BGF was convicted of two counts of assault which constituted related acts of violence, but compensation awarded covered both related and unrelated acts, and was not apportioned. Without clear compensation for acts for which BGF was convicted, there is no relevant offence as required by the statutory scheme, thus restitution is unavailable.
Court Disposition
Decision reversed; order for restitution not made.
Orders
- ['The decision of the Commissioner for Victims Rights requiring BGF to make restitution is reversed.' 'The Tribunal determines not to make an order requiring BGF to pay restitution to the Commissioner for Victims Rights.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment