BGF v Commissioner of Victims Rights (No 2) [2015] NSWCATAD 232
BGF was convicted of two counts of assault occasioning bodily harm upon the victim arising from substantially the same facts as those constituting the act of violence for which statutory compensation was awarded, thus satisfying the requirements for a relevant offence under s 58 and supporting confirmation of the restitution order under s 59 and s 67 of the Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Remitted Determination After Appeal
- Outcome
- Restitution order confirmed
- Legal Topics
- ['restitution Orders' 'victims Rights and Support' 'administrative Review' "definition of 'relevant Offence'"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Remitted Determination After Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant (BGF) had been convicted of a relevant offence as defined under s 58 of the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013' 'Whether the Commissioner properly exercised discretion to issue a restitution order under s 59 of the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013' 'Whether statutory compensation was awarded for acts of violence in respect of which the applicant was convicted']
Ratio Decidendi
BGF was convicted of two counts of assault occasioning bodily harm upon the victim arising from substantially the same facts as those constituting the act of violence for which statutory compensation was awarded, thus satisfying the requirements for a relevant offence under s 58 and supporting confirmation of the restitution order under s 59 and s 67 of the Act.
Court Disposition
Restitution order confirmed
Orders
- ['The restitution order made against BGF on 28 August 2013 is confirmed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment