BHP Coal Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2014] FCAFC 138
The appeal was commenced before 1 January 2013 and thus the pre-amendment version of Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 570 applied. There was no procedural defect invalidating the appeal or requiring a different outcome as any irregularity could be cured by s 51 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth). Costs should follow the event in the absence of a statutory prohibition. The Full Court was not satisfied that CSBP No 2 was plainly wrong and its reasoning should be followed, so the limitation on costs in the amended s 570 did not apply to this appeal.
- Parties
- Appellant: BHP Coal Pty Ltd; Respondent: Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Costs Determination After Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to Appellant
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Industrial Matters, Appellate Jurisdiction, Procedural Irregularity, Commencement of Appeal Under Court Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BHP Coal Pty Ltd
Appellant
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Determination After Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the limitation on awarding costs under Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 570 (as amended) applied to the appeal
- 2 When the appeal was 'commenced' for transitional provision purposes
- 3 Whether the failure to file a further notice of appeal after leave was fatal or a mere irregularity under s 51 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was commenced before 1 January 2013 and thus the pre-amendment version of Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 570 applied. There was no procedural defect invalidating the appeal or requiring a different outcome as any irregularity could be cured by s 51 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth). Costs should follow the event in the absence of a statutory prohibition. The Full Court was not satisfied that CSBP No 2 was plainly wrong and its reasoning should be followed, so the limitation on costs in the amended s 570 did not apply to this appeal.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to Appellant
Orders
- The respondent pay the appellant's costs of and incidental to the appeal and the application for leave to appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment