Environment Protection Authority v BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd [2003] NSWLEC 46

Environment Protection Authority v BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd [2003] NSWLEC 46

The penalty for breach of licence condition should reflect the low level of harm (dust nuisance only), the foreseeability and preventability of the incident, measures taken after the event, company history of previous offences, and the early guilty plea warrants a 25 per cent discount on penalty.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing After Plea of Guilty
Outcome
defendant convicted; penalty imposed
Legal Topics
['environmental Offences' 'penalty Assessment' 'licence Condition Breach' 'dust Suppression' 'sentencing Mitigation']
['environmental Law' 'criminal Law'] ['environmental Offences' 'penalty Assessment' 'licence Condition Breach' 'dust Suppression' 'sentencing Mitigation']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing After Plea of Guilty

  1. 1 ['Determination of penalty for breach of environmental protection licence condition resulting in dust emissions' 'Considerations under Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 241 for penalty assessment' 'Discount for early plea of guilty under Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 22']

Ratio Decidendi

The penalty for breach of licence condition should reflect the low level of harm (dust nuisance only), the foreseeability and preventability of the incident, measures taken after the event, company history of previous offences, and the early guilty plea warrants a 25 per cent discount on penalty.

Court Disposition

defendant convicted; penalty imposed

Orders

  • ['Defendant convicted of the offence as charged.' 'Defendant must pay a penalty of $30,000.' "Defendant must pay prosecutor's costs in accordance with section 52(2) of the Land and Environment Court Act." 'The exhibits may be returned.']