BHPB Freight Pty Ltd v Cosco Oceania Chartering Pty Ltd (No 4) [2009] FCA 1448
BHPB was entitled to judgment on the breach of warranty of authority claim. Because the charterparty would have yielded hire and ballast bonus in US dollars but there was no evidence proving the currency in which the remaining expenses were discharged, judgment should be in US dollars for unpaid hire and ballast bonus, or the Australian dollar equivalent at payment or execution, and in Australian dollars for the balance converted at the rates when each debt fell due, taken as the invoice date. Interest on the US dollar judgment should use the US prime borrowing rate calculated monthly, while interest on the Australian dollar judgment should use the applicable Victorian Supreme Court rate,...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Practice and Procedure; Costs Following Judgment on Substantive Claims / Reasons on Election of Claim, Currency of Judgment, Interest and Costs After Substantive Judgment
- Outcome
- BHPB to have judgment against Cosco on the breach of warranty of authority claim; ordinary costs awarded to BHPB, indemnity costs refused, and a Bullock order to be made in respect of Seawise's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['judgment in Foreign Currency' 'date for Conversion to Australian Currency' 'interest on Foreign Currency Judgment' 'calderbank Offer' 'indemnity Costs' 'bullock Order' 'sanderson Order' 'breach of Warranty of Authority']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Practice and Procedure; Costs Following Judgment on Substantive Claims / Reasons on Election of Claim, Currency of Judgment, Interest and Costs After Substantive Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['On what claim BHPB should elect to take judgment.' 'In what currency judgment should be given for damages for breach of warranty of authority.' 'What interest rate and period should apply to judgment in foreign currency and Australian currency.' 'Whether BHPB should receive indemnity costs following refusal of its Calderbank offer.' 'Whether indemnity costs should be awarded because respondents abandoned contentions at trial.' "Whether a Bullock or Sanderson order should be made so that Cosco bears Seawise's costs."]
Ratio Decidendi
BHPB was entitled to judgment on the breach of warranty of authority claim. Because the charterparty would have yielded hire and ballast bonus in US dollars but there was no evidence proving the currency in which the remaining expenses were discharged, judgment should be in US dollars for unpaid hire and ballast bonus, or the Australian dollar equivalent at payment or execution, and in Australian dollars for the balance converted at the rates when each debt fell due, taken as the invoice date. Interest on the US dollar judgment should use the US prime borrowing rate calculated monthly, while interest on the Australian dollar judgment should use the applicable Victorian Supreme Court rate,...
Court Disposition
BHPB to have judgment against Cosco on the breach of warranty of authority claim; ordinary costs awarded to BHPB, indemnity costs refused, and a Bullock order to be made in respect of Seawise's costs.
Orders
- ['Judgment for the unpaid hire and ballast bonus is to be in US dollars or the Australian equivalent at the time of payment or execution.' "The balance of BHPB's claim is to be in Australian dollars, converted at the rates existing when each debt fell due, taken to be the day on which the relevant invoice was sent."...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment