BHPB Freight Pty Ltd v Cosco Oceania Chartering Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCA 1656
Cosco is permitted to bring a cross-claim against Seascope for contribution limited to damages recoverable for breach of warranty of authority and section 87 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) claim; Cosco is not permitted to seek proportionate liability against Seascope under Pt VIA of the Trade Practices Act or Pt IVAA of the Wrongs Act because such claims fall outside their operation. Each party to bear its own costs.
- Parties
- Applicant: BHPB Freight Pty Ltd; First Respondent: Cosco Oceania Chartering Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Braemar Seascope Pty Ltd (formerly known as Seawise Australia Pty Ltd and Southern Chartering Pty Ltd)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Practice and Procedure / Interlocutory Application Leave to Bring Cross Claim
- Outcome
- Cosco's application granted in part; otherwise dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Proportionate Liability, Contribution, Breach of Warranty of Authority, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BHPB Freight Pty Ltd
Applicant
Cosco Oceania Chartering Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Braemar Seascope Pty Ltd (formerly known as Seawise Australia Pty Ltd and Southern Chartering Pty Ltd)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Practice and Procedure / Interlocutory Application Leave to Bring Cross Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Cosco is entitled to bring a cross-claim against Seascope for contribution.
- 2 Whether Cosco can seek to limit its liability under Pt VIA of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and Pt IVAA of the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic).
- 3 Application of s 79 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) to the proportionate liability regime.
Ratio Decidendi
Cosco is permitted to bring a cross-claim against Seascope for contribution limited to damages recoverable for breach of warranty of authority and section 87 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) claim; Cosco is not permitted to seek proportionate liability against Seascope under Pt VIA of the Trade Practices Act or Pt IVAA of the Wrongs Act because such claims fall outside their operation. Each party to bear its own costs.
Court Disposition
Cosco's application granted in part; otherwise dismissed.
Orders
- Cosco Oceania Chartering Pty Ltd have leave to bring a claim against Braemar Seascope Pty Ltd for contribution, limited to damages the applicant may recover from Cosco on breach of warranty of authority and claim for compensation under section 87 of the Trade Practices Act 1974.
- Cosco's application otherwise dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment