Bianca Shandell SANTO v R [2009] NSWCCA 269
The refusal to call the co-offender as a Crown witness did not cause a miscarriage of justice as his evidence was unreliable and given in the defence case. The nature of his conviction was not relevant and did not constitute an exceptional feature requiring admission of evidence. The trial judge's direction cured any resulting prejudice from the appellant’s revelation of prior custody.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bianca Shandell SANTO; Crown: REGINA
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Robbery in Company, Appeal Against Conviction, Evidence Admissibility, Crown's Obligation to Call Witnesses, Miscarriage of Justice, Directions to Jury
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bianca Shandell SANTO
Appellant
REGINA
Crown
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether miscarriage of justice arose from Crown's refusal to call co-offender as witness
- 2 Admissibility of evidence about co-offender's offence
- 3 Whether jury should have been discharged after appellant revealed prior custody
Ratio Decidendi
The refusal to call the co-offender as a Crown witness did not cause a miscarriage of justice as his evidence was unreliable and given in the defence case. The nature of his conviction was not relevant and did not constitute an exceptional feature requiring admission of evidence. The trial judge's direction cured any resulting prejudice from the appellant’s revelation of prior custody.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against conviction dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment